Democracy Spreading In Middle East

Following the assassination of a popular former lebanese Prime Minister, and with tens of thousands of protesters defying orders to break up, the Syrian controlled governmenr of Lebanese Prime Minister Omar Karami has stepped down. It's a victory for the people of Lebanon, who are calling for the Syrian army to withdraw from Lebanon, and who are demanding free elections.

This comes on the heels of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's announcement of multi-candidate elections for that country's top position. It would be the first time free elections would be held for President.

Remember that illegitimate elections in the Ukraine and Georgia have been overturned recently, and that free elections were held for the leadership of the Palestinian people, and there's a powerful message to be taken. People everywhere want a say in their governemnt. They want to choose who leads their countries. It's exactly what President Bush has been calling for, and it's further evidence that he's leading this country, and the world, in the right direction.

Do you honestly think that any of these things would have occurred in we had never freed the people of Afghanistan and Iraq? In his State of the Union Address, the President pledged the America's support for people doing just what the Lebanese have done. Let's watch and see what happens; it should be good.

Color Photos From World War I

Thanks to blogger Puddle Pirate of the blog Brain Shavings for tipping us off to this... The French were apparently busy taking color pictures during the First World War. These are fascinating.

Good News From Iraq

Arthur Chrenkoff has just posted Good News From Iraq - #22. If you haven't heard of this, it's his regular listing of the positive stories coming out of Iraq our mainstream media doesn't see fit to report.

Some of the good:

In the recently held Iraqi elections, many of the big winners were women. Of the 275 members of the newly elected Iraqi Assembly, 86 are women (over 30%).

Iraq's first constitutional conference is underway, working out in broad terms the shape of the nation's permanent constitution.

The Iraqi stock market is showing strong growth, and there's talk of opening up the market to foreign investors. Meanwhile, Iraq's central bank will be allowed to open a deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which will earn it millions of dollars in vital interest income. That interest, over $100 million a year, can be used to improve Iraq's infrastructure.

Foreign banks are moving into the nation.

More passenger airlines are scheduling service to Baghdad.

Initiatives are in place to support development and economic growth in the agriculture sector, and success is being seen.

On the environmental front, one of the world's greatest marshland habitats - and home of an ancient culture - is beginning to show the first signs of recovery after decades of systematic destruction under Saddam Hussein.

Coalition troops are providing vital reconstruction and humanitarian assistance, in addition to providing security. New schools have been built and others are under construction; the health infrastructure is being rebuilt, including some areas of the country often ignored; railroad construction and rehabilitation continues; help for widows and orphans of the Iran-Iraq war is being given by our troops as well.

About 6,000 old bullet-proof vests have been sent from police departments around the U.S. to Iraqi police forces.

There's so much more. It's always a great read, and it reinforces that most of the major national news outlets don't have any desire to bring the American public the positive stories coming out of Iraq. Arthur Chrenkoff is the only person aggregating these stories and bringing them to the American public.

Why Fear A Peaceful Religion?

The New York Times reports that great numbers of Dutch are emigrating to Canada, Australia and New Zealand as more and more Muslims come to the Netherlands. With them, apparently, are coming gangs and increased crime and violence.

Socialized Medicine Anyone?

A seven-year-old British girl has been on a liquid diet since birth, after British physicians diagnosed her with a disease that prevents swallowing. A trip to visit doctors here in the U.S. have solved her dilemna... she only had swollen tonsils. She's now eating solid foods and doing fine.

Avoiding Money Scams

The folks at Bankrate.com have posted the eight biggest financial scams going right now, with tips on how to avoid and/or stop them. If you earn, save or spend money (who'd I leave out?) it's worth your time to read these.

Best Idea For Tax Reform

I've written before about the National Retail Sales Tax, also known as the Fair Tax. The proposal is before the Congress once again, introduced in the House as HR 25 and in the Senate as SR 25. You probably already have some idea about the Fair Tax, but let me share the basics once again. This comes from the Americans For Fair Tax web site, and it spells things out very clearly...

The FairTax proposal is a comprehensive plan to replace federal income and payroll taxes, including personal, gift, estate, capital gains, alternative minimum, Social Security/Medicare, self-employment, and corporate taxes. The FairTax proposal integrates such features as a progressive national retail sales tax, dollar-for-dollar revenue replacement, and a rebate to ensure that no American pays such federal taxes up to the poverty level. Included in the FairTax plan is the repeal of the 16th Amendment to the Constitution. The FairTax allows Americans to keep 100 percent of their paychecks (minus any state income taxes), ends corporate taxes and compliance costs hidden in the retail cost of goods and services, and fully funds the federal government while fulfilling the promise of Social Security and Medicare.

Americans take home their whole paychecks.
Not only do more Americans have jobs, but they also take home 100 percent of their paychecks (except where state income taxes apply). No federal income taxes or payroll taxes are withheld from paychecks, pensions, or Social Security checks.

No federal sales tax up to the poverty level means progressivity like today's tax system.
To ensure no American pays tax on necessities, the FairTax plan provides a prepaid, monthly rebate (prebate) for every registered household to cover the consumption tax spent on necessities up to the federal poverty level. This, along with several other features, is how the FairTax completely untaxes the poor, lowers the tax burden on most, while making the overall rate progressive. However, the FairTax is progressive based on lifestyle/spending choices, rather than simply punishing those taxpayers who are successful. Do you see how much freer life is with the FairTax instead of the income tax?

No tax on used goods. The amount you pay to fund the government is totally visible.
With the FairTax you are only taxed once on any good or service, the sales tax is charged just as state sales taxes are today. If you choose to buy used goods - used car, used home, used appliances - you do not pay the FairTax. If, as a business owner or farmer, you buy something for strictly business purposes (not for personal consumption), you pay no consumption tax. When you decide what to buy and how much to spend, you see exactly how much you are contributing to the government with each purchase.

Retail prices no longer hide corporate taxes or their compliance costs, which drive up costs for those who can least, afford to pay.
Did you know that hidden income taxes and the cost of complying with them currently make up 20 percent or more percent of all retail prices? It's true. According to Dr. Dale Jorgenson of Harvard University, hidden income taxes are passed on to the consumer in the form of higher prices - from an average 22 percent on goods to an average 25 percent on services - for everything you buy. If competition does not allow prices to rise, corporations lower labor costs, again hurting those who can least afford to lose their jobs. Finally, if prices are as high as competition allows and labor costs are as low as practical, profits/dividends to shareholders are driven down, thereby hurting retirement savings for moms-and-pops and pension funds invested in Corporate America. With the FairTax, the sham of corporate taxation ends, competition drives prices down, more people in America have jobs, and retirement/pension funds see improved performance.

The income tax exports our jobs, rather than our products. The FairTax brings jobs home.
Most importantly, the FairTax does not burden U.S. exports as they are with the current income tax. So the FairTax allows U.S. exports to sell overseas for prices 22 percent lower, on average, than they do now, with similar profit margins. Lower prices sharply increase demand for U.S. exports, thereby increasing job creation in U.S.manufacturing sectors. At home, imports are subject to the same FairTax rate as domestically produced goods. Not only does the FairTax put U.S. products sold here on the same tax footing as foreign imports, but the dramatic lowering of compliance costs in comparison to other countries' value-added taxes also gives U.S. products a definitive pricing advantage which foreign tax systems cannot match.

The FairTax strategy is revenue neutrality: Neither raise nor lower taxes so consumer costs remain stable.
The FairTax pays for all current government operations, including Social Security and Medicare. Government revenues are more stable and predictable than with the federal income tax because consumption is a more constant revenue base than is income.

If you were in a 23-percent income tax bracket, the federal government would take $23 out of your paycheck for every $100 you made. With the FairTax, if the federal government gets $23 out of every $100 spent in America, the same total revenue is delivered to the federal government. This is revenue neutrality. So, instead of paycheck-earning Americans paying 15.3 percent of their paychecks in Social Security/Medicare payroll taxes, plus an average of 18 percent of their paychecks in federal income tax, for a total of about 33 percent, consumers in America pay only $23 out of every $100. Or about 30 percent at the cash register when they elect to spend on new goods or services for their own personal consumption. And this tax is collected only on spending above the federal poverty level, providing important progressivity.

Tax criminals - don't make criminals out of honest taxpayers.
Today, the IRS will admit to 25 percent non-compliance with the code. FairTax.org will be generous and simply take the position that this is likely a conservative estimate of the underground economy. However, this does not take into account the criminal/drug/porn economy, which equally conservative estimates put at one trillion dollars of untaxed activity. The FairTax will tax this - criminals love to flash that cash at retail - while continuing to provide the federal penalties so effective in bringing such miscreants to justice. The substantial decrease in points of compliance - from every wage earner, investor, and retiree, down to only retailers - also allows enforcement to concentrate on following the money to criminal activity, rather than making potential criminals out of every taxpayer struggling to decipher the current code.

So, in a nutshell, the Fair Tax would allow workers to bring home virtually all the money they have earned, and would only tax them on new retail purchases. No taxes on used products (house, car, etc.) or on purchases up to the poverty level. The less you spend, the less taxes you pay. Imagine a tax system that you actually have control over.

It's simple mathematics...
The current system taxes you on every dollar you earn. You pay tax again when you make a purchase (indirect taxes included in the costs of goods and services). You invest the money you've earned in stocks or bonds, and pay taxes on it again when you cash out. Leave those earnings for your heirs, they are taxed again.

Under the Fair Tax, your money is ONLY taxed when you make purchases. Invest your earnings in a retirement account, stocks, bonds, mutual funds, etc.... no taxes.

Under this plan, all visitors to this country would contribute to the tax base when they make retail purchases. Even the wealthiest Americans would pay. No tax code, no loopholes.

I encourage you to look into the idea, study it, get to understand it. It's really not all that complex. See what you think. It's fair, it's simple, it's so much better than the system we have today.

Liberal Dimwit Alert

WARNING: Liberal philosophy follows. It's ugly and distasteful, so read at your peril...

Thomas Naughton, columnist for the University of Massachusetts-Amhurst Daily Collegian, writes about those yellow "Support Our Troops" ribbons. He's a liberal, so you can guess his feelings about the ribbons. He sounds like a slightly more extreme version of Bob Sommer. If this is the direction the Libs want to go with their politics, I say fine. Here's a bit of what Naughton says:

I will never say, "support the troops." I don't believe in the validity of that statement. People say, "I don't support the war, I support the troops" as though you can actually separate the two. You cannot; the troops are a part of the war, they have become the war and there is no valid dissection of the two.

I look into the cars of people with "support the troops" ribbons as I speed past, trying to find some trace of recognition on their face, recognition of their guilt and the fact that they have given up. I usually see nothing; just a mouth moving robotically, singing the pop hits of today or the contemporary country wine of fake cowboys who share a lot with George Bush: no shame.

Those ribbons are yellow for a reason, they are not the mark of armed forces support, they are the mark of cowards.

For some reason, I think this guy probably sees Howard Dean as too centrist to be leading the Democratic Party.

Bragging Will Get You Every Time

A Chicago man is arrested after he and accomplices rob bank. They got away clean with the money, but are busted when he calls radio show to brag about robbery. Call traced, jail time to follow.

Assault By Rubber-Band

Today's lesson in mindless public school administration brought to you by Liberty Middle School in Orange County, Florida. Seventh-grader Robert Gomez, age 12, picked up a rubber band off the floro and put it around his wrist. His teacher asked him to give the rubber band to her, so he tossed it on her desk. For that act, he's been suspended for 10 days, and faces expulsion, for threatening her "with a weapon". That weapon... the rubber band!

Who Was Deep Throat?

There's renewed speculation that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice William Rehnquist might have been the legendary "Deep Throat", secret Watergate information source for journalists Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein.

GI Gets Hate Mail... From Sixth Graders

Alex Kunhardt, a teacher at JHS 51 William Alexander (Junior High) in New York City, encouraged his sixth-grade students to write letters to a US soldier stationed near the DMZ in South Korea. When Pfc. Rob Jacobs opened the letters, he wasn't prepared for what he saw. Many letters were filled with insults, political rhetoric and demoralizing predictions. It's apparent that the children were either coaxed by, or had letters written by, either parents or the teacher himself.

Here's a sample of what the 11 and 12 year olds wrote:

"Even thoe [sic] you are risking your life for our country, have you seen how many civilians you or some other soldier killed?"

"I know your [sic] trying to save our country and kill the terrorists but you are also destroying holy places like Mosques."

"From what I see on TV and in the newspaper, I don't think the US is even close to obtaining Iraqi freedom."

"I'm concerned that George W. Bush is president for four more years, because he doesn't want to get troops out, so you might end up staying longer."

"Bush thinks he's brave . . . in his safe little white house with as many guards as he thinks he needs."

"By the way, when you shoot someone, is it great or horrible?"

The stories I've read don't indicate why Pfc. Jacobs was singled out.

I know things have changed in the twenty-plus years since I was their age, but I don't for a minute believe these children wrote these things on their own. They had to be coached, which makes the situation even more despicable.

Responses from readers to the original NY Post story are here. The best comment:

Please tell Pfc. Rob Jacobs not to be too upset about the letters he received from the sixth-graders. These are, after all, New York City schoolchildren being taught by New York City public-school teachers. In other words, they are uneducated.

Liberal Insult To U.S. Troops

California blogger Digger, of Digger's Realm, has been documenting the saga of two liberal Berkeley lawyers, husband and wife, who have been hanging an American soldier in effigy on their home in Sacramento (LINK WARNING: Some graphic language). Steve and Virginia Pearcy, the couple in question, have been quite outspoken in their support for the forces our troops are fighting in Iraq. It's a pretty disgusting display, quite frankly. The effigy is torn down, the Pearcys put it back up. The sign in their Porsche (nice Liberal ride!) is utterly obscene.

Further evidence that most on the Left have no idea what it means to be free, don't understand the responsibilities that go with freedom, and are unwilling to support what must be done to protect the liberties that they take for granted.

Blacks, Dems and The G.O.P.

I mentioned the comments of Howard Dean last week concerning the Republican Party and Black voters. The comments outraged many on the Right, who saw them not only as race-baiting, but also as a backhand racist comment. Of course, there was silence from the Libs.

Anyway, it brings me to this fine column (printed below) by National Review contributing editor Deroy Murdock. It's a comparison of Republican and Democratic history in regards to the Civil Rights Movement. Read it, understand it, share it with others. By the way, Deroy Murdock is African-American.

Grand Old Party
Blacks might be surprised to compare Republican history with the Democrats’.

Today marks the 90th anniversary of a very special White House ceremony. President Woodrow Wilson hosted his Cabinet and the entire U.S. Supreme Court for a screening of D. W. Griffith's racist masterpiece, Birth of a Nation. The executive mansion's first film presentation depicted, according to Griffith, the Ku Klux Klan's heroic, post-Civil War struggle against the menace of emancipated blacks, portrayed by white actors in black face. As black civil-rights leader W.E.B. DuBois explained: In Griffith's 1915 motion picture, "The freed man was represented either as an ignorant fool, a vicious rapist, a venal or unscrupulous politician, or a faithful idiot."

Thumbs up, Wilson exclaimed. The film "is like writing history with lightning," he remarked, adding, "it is all so terribly true."

This vignette — recently recounted in Ken Burns's PBS documentary, Unforgivable Blackness — was neither the first nor last time a prominent Democrat plunged a hot knife in black America's collective back. Each February, Black History Month recalls Democrat Harry Truman's 1948 desegregation of the armed forces and Democrat Lyndon Baines Johnson's signature on the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the greatest black legislative victory since Republican Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery in 1863. This annual commemoration, however, largely overlooks the many milestones Republicans and blacks have achieved together by overcoming reactionary Democrats.

The House Policy Committee's 2005 Republican Freedom Calendar offers 365 examples of GOP support for women, blacks, and other minorities, often over Democratic objections. Among its highlights:

"To stop the Democrats' pro-slavery agenda, anti-slavery activists founded the Republican party, starting with a few dozen men and women in Ripon, Wisconsin on March 20, 1854," the calendar notes. "Democratic opposition to Republican efforts to protect the civil rights of all Americans lasted not only throughout Reconstruction, but well into the 20th century. In the south, those Democrats who most bitterly opposed equality for blacks founded the Ku Klux Klan, which operated as the party's terrorist wing."

Contemporary partisan hyperbole? Consider this 1866 comment from Governor Oliver Morton (R., Ind.), who is immortalized in the U.S. Capitol's Statuary Hall: "Every one who shoots down Negroes in the streets, burns Negro school-houses and meeting-houses, and murders women and children by the light of their own flaming dwellings, calls himself a Democrat," Morton said. "Every New York rioter in 1863 who burned up little children in colored asylums, who robbed, ravished, and murdered indiscriminately in the midst of a blazing city for three days and nights, calls himself a Democrat."

White supremacists worked club in hand with Democrats for decades:

May 22, 1856: Two years after the Grand Old party's birth, U.S. Senator Charles Sumner (R., Mass.) rose to decry pro-slavery Democrats. Congressman Preston Brooks (D., S.C.) responded by grabbing a stick and beating Sumner unconscious in the Senate chamber. Disabled, Sumner could not resume his duties for three years.

July 30, 1866: New Orleans's Democratic government ordered police to raid an integrated GOP meeting, killing 40 people and injuring 150.

September 28, 1868: Democrats in Opelousas, Louisiana killed nearly 300 blacks who tried to foil an assault on a Republican newspaper editor.

October 7, 1868: Republicans criticized Democrats' national slogan: "This is a white man's country: Let white men rule."

April 20, 1871: The GOP Congress adopted the Ku Klux Klan Act, banning the pro-Democrat domestic terrorist group.

October 18, 1871: GOP President Ulysses S. Grant dispatched federal troops to quell Klan violence in South Carolina.

September 14, 1874: Racist white Democrats stormed Louisiana's statehouse to oust GOP Governor William Kellogg's racially integrated administration; 27 are killed.

August 17, 1937: Republicans opposed Democratic President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Supreme Court nominee, U.S. Senator Hugo Black (D., Al.), a former Klansman who defended Klansmen against race-murder charges.

February 2005: The Democrats' Klan-coddling today is embodied by KKK alumnus Robert Byrd, West Virginia's logorrheic U.S. senator and, having served since January 3, 1959, that body's dean. Thirteen years earlier, Byrd wrote this to the KKK's Imperial Wizard: "The Klan is needed today as never before and I am anxious to see its rebirth here in West Virginia." Byrd led Senate Democrats as late as December 1988. On March 4, 2001, Byrd told Fox News's Tony Snow: "There are white niggers. I've seen a lot of white niggers in my time; I'm going to use that word." National Democrats never have arranged a primary challenge against or otherwise pressed this one-time cross-burner to get lost.

Contrast the KKKozy Democrats with the GOP. When former Klansman David Duke ran for Louisiana governor in 1991 as a Republican, national GOP officials scorned him. Local Republicans endorsed incumbent Democrat Edwin Edwards, despite his ethical baggage. As one Republican-created bumper sticker pleaded: "Vote for the crook: It's important!"

Republicans also have supported legislation favorable to blacks, often against intense Democratic headwinds:

In 1865, Congressional Republicans unanimously backed the 13th Amendment, which made slavery unconstitutional. Among Democrats, 63 percent of senators and 78 percent of House members voted: "No."

In 1866, 94 percent of GOP senators and 96 percent of GOP House members approved the 14th Amendment, guaranteeing all Americans equal protection of the law. Every congressional Democrat voted: "No."

February 28, 1871: The GOP Congress passed the Enforcement Act, giving black voters federal protection.

February 8, 1894: Democratic President Grover Cleveland and a Democratic Congress repealed the GOP's Enforcement Act, denying black voters federal protection.

January 26, 1922: The U.S. House adopted Rep. Leonidas Dyer's (R., Mo.) bill making lynching a federal crime. Filibustering Senate Democrats killed the measure.

May 17, 1954: As chief justice, former three-term governor Earl Warren (R., Calif.) led the U.S. Supreme Court's desegregation of government schools via the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision. GOP President Dwight Eisenhower's Justice Department argued for Topeka, Kansas's black school children. Democrat John W. Davis, who lost a presidential bid to incumbent Republican Calvin Coolidge in 1924, defended "separate but equal" classrooms.

September 24, 1957: Eisenhower deployed the 82nd Airborne Division to desegregate Little Rock's government schools over the strenuous resistance of Governor Orval Faubus (D., Ark.).

May 6, 1960: Eisenhower signs the GOP's 1960 Civil Rights Act after it survived a five-day, five-hour filibuster by 18 Senate Democrats.

July 2, 1964: Democratic President Johnson signed the 1964 Civil Rights Act after former Klansman Robert Byrd's 14-hour filibuster and the votes of 22 other Senate Democrats (including Tennessee's Al Gore, Sr.) failed to scuttle the measure. Illinois Republican Everett Dirksen rallied 26 GOP senators and 44 Democrats to invoke cloture and allow the bill's passage. According to John Fonte in the January 9, 2003, National Review, 82 percent of Republicans so voted, versus only 66 percent of Democrats.

True, Senator Barry Goldwater (R., Ariz.) opposed this bill the very year he became the GOP's presidential standard-bearer. However, Goldwater supported the 1957 and 1960 Civil Rights Acts and called for integrating Arizona's National Guard two years before Truman desegregated the military. Goldwater feared the 1964 Act would limit freedom of association in the private sector, a controversial but principled libertarian objection rooted in the First Amendment rather than racial hatred.

June 29, 1982: President Ronald Reagan signed a 25-year extension of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The Republican party also is the home of numerous "firsts." Among them:

Until 1935, every black federal legislator was Republican. America's first black U.S. Representative, South Carolina's Joseph Rainey, and our first black senator, Mississippi's Hiram Revels, both reached Capitol Hill in 1870. On December 9, 1872, Louisiana Republican Pinckney Benton Stewart "P.B.S." Pinchback became America's first black governor.

August 8, 1878: GOP supply-siders may hate to admit it, but America's first black Collector of Internal Revenue was former U.S. Rep. James Rapier (R., Ala.).

October 16, 1901: GOP President Theodore Roosevelt invited to the White House as its first black dinner guest Republican educator Booker T. Washington. The pro-Democrat Richmond Times newspaper warned that consequently, "White women may receive attentions from Negro men." As Toni Marshall wrote in the November 9, 1995, Washington Times, when Roosevelt sought reelection in 1904, Democrats produced a button that showed their presidential nominee, Alton Parker, beside a white couple while Roosevelt posed with a white bride and black groom. The button read: "The Choice Is Yours."

GOP presidents Gerald Ford in 1975 and Ronald Reagan in 1982 promoted Daniel James and Roscoe Robinson to become, respectively, the Air Force's and Army's first black four-star generals.

November 2, 1983: President Reagan established Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday as a national holiday, the first such honor for a black American.

President Reagan named Colin Powell America's first black national-security adviser while GOP President George W. Bush appointed him our first black secretary of state.

President G.W. Bush named Condoleezza Rice America's first black female NSC chief, then our second (consecutive) black secretary of State. Just last month, one-time Klansman Robert Byrd and other Senate Democrats stalled Rice's confirmation for a week. Amid unanimous GOP support, 12 Democrats and Vermont Independent James Jeffords opposed Rice — the most "No" votes for a State designee since 14 senators frowned on Henry Clay in 1825.

"The first Republican I knew was my father, and he is still the Republican I most admire," Rice has said. "He joined our party because the Democrats in Jim Crow Alabama of 1952 would not register him to vote. The Republicans did. My father has never forgotten that day, and neither have I."

"We started our party with the express intent of protecting the American people from the Democrats' pro-slavery policies that expressly made people inferior to the state," wrote Rep. Christopher Cox (R., Calif.), who authorized the calendar last year as House Policy chairman. "Today, the animating spirit of the Republican Party is exactly the same as it was then: free people, free minds, free markets, free expression, and unlimited opportunity."

"Leading the organized opposition to these ideas 150 years ago, just as today, was the Democratic Party," Cox continued. "Then, just as now, their hallmarks were politically correct speech; a preference for government control over individual initiative...and an insistence on seeing people as members of groups rather than as individuals."

But what about racial preferences? The GOP's embrace of color-neutral policies parallels Martin Luther King's dream of racial equality over racial scale tipping. "The constitutional amendments that the Republican party supported after the Civil War did not advance preferences by race," Cox told me. "They made government view every person as an individual, not as a member of a racial group."

Alas, even as Republicans promote work over welfare, educational choice, and personal retirement accounts, all of which would empower blacks, some 90 percent of blacks vote Democrat as reflexively as knees kick when tapped with rubber mallets. After inspecting the Democrats' handiwork — e.g. the tar pit that is public assistance, the Dresden that is the ghetto school system, and the pyramid scheme that is Social Security (which robs too many blacks who die before recouping their "investment") — black Americans should ask Democrats: "Yesterday's gone. What have you done for us lately?"

Applauding Marines

You've probably all seen the Anheuser-Busch commercial from the Super Bowl showing Marines walking through an airport and getting applause. Here's an actual letter from a Marine, talking about the commercial, the way the media reports on the job he and his comrades are doing in Iraq, and the response he received when returning to the States. It's a must read. Thanks to Alpha Patriot for the heads-up.

Crackpot Congressman Concocts CBS Conspiracy Crap

From Little Green Footballs:

Yesterday Congressman Maurice Hinchey (D-NY) hosted a community forum in Ithaca, New York, on the future Of Social Security.

An LGF operative was present in the audience and happened to be recording as Rep. Hinchey launched into a barking moonbat conspiracy rant worthy of Democratic Underground, telling the audience he believed the fake CBS memos were planted by Karl Rove to discredit Dan Rather, and divert attention from President Bush's "draft dodging."

When our operative asked Hinchey if he had evidence for these charges, he first said, "Yes, I do," but when asked a second time he admitted he did not.

Our operative pressed the issue, "Don't you think it's irresponsible to make charges like that?" Hinchey replied, "No, I don't, I think it's very important to make charges like that ... I think it's very important to combat this kind of activity in every way that you can, and I'm willing, as most people are not, to step forward in situations like this and take risks."

For more on this, including transcripts and audio of the whole exchange, courtesy the guys at LGF, click here.

Own A Piece Of Disneyland

Disney is auctioning off cars from two of their Disneyland rides: Space Mountain and the Skyway sky buckets. Right now, the Space Mountain car is going for $2700, and the sky bucket car is up to $4200.

Political Bloggers: The New Paparazzi

Thanks to blogger John Little at Blogs Of War for pointing this out...

Mark Cuban, Dallas Mavericks owner and celebrity millionaire, writes about political bloggers:

"Whether it's been newspapers, magazines, TV or radio, the opportunities to reach an audience has been limited to a finite number of local and national gatekeepers. Just outside those gates, knocking on the door, trying to be heard for the past 100 or more years have been wanna be Woodward and Bernsteins. People with information, ideas and concepts that they know the populace would respond to have been turned away, again and again.

"Its payback time . The bloggers are here, and they are ready to knock down the gates and get their pound of flesh. The traditional media has no idea what is about to hit them.

"In every major conference, at every major speech, sitting at tables in restaurants, there is going to be a blogger or podcaster with microphone, PDA, Videophone, laptop or paper and pencil in hand. Listening. Taking notes. That information is going to be transmitted to and from a blog entry and placed in the hands of "the readers".

"Unlike celebrities who hear or see the flash of the camera, the gatekeepers don't know they are there. Blogging in plain site. Questioning everything.

"Dan Rather and Eason Jordan were just practice laps. Let me assure you that from now on, EVERYTHING said. Every video shown. Every picture presented from any traditional media source is going to be scrutinized. The level of scrutiny will make your editors blush.

"The gatekeepers are under attack. I'm not saying its right or wrong, but it is the new reality."

Interesting Political Quiz

Here's a pretty interesting political leaning quiz from the folks at OkCupid.com. It's pretty thorough, with about 40 questions. According to this quiz, I'm a social and economic conservative, and can best be described as a Republican. Also, I "exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness." Guess that about says it. Interestingly, you can see your results in two ways. Here are mine...



and



Give it a whirl...

What Does "Support Our Troops" Really Mean?

Bob Sommer, commentator for NPR's All Things Considered, recently opined on the yellow ribbon car decals and magnets saying "Support Our Troops". He says he's finally figured out what the message "Support Our Troops" really means:

That curious phrase, "support our troops," on those yellow ribbon magnets seems to accuse me of not doing my part. Then I realized that "support our troops" is a code! It requires parsing. Here's what I think it means: Those who presumably need to be admonished to support the troops are those who oppose the decisions of the administration. "Support our troops" means, then, that we should be supporting the war. I believe that most yellow-magnet bearers want support not just for the troops, but for the mission, the presence, the president. Maybe the magnets should say: "Shut up and support our troops."

Seems that Sommer takes an awful lot of offense at three simple words. I'm not sure how someone who appreciates the sacrifices our soldiers and sailors make could make hte comments he does. Maybe he doesn't actually support our troops at all. It's like my Dad said, "The bit dog always barks."